NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 512 vs 128
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 1,217 gflops vs 432.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Launch date | 17 November 2015 vs 28 March 2008 |
Pipelines | 512 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,217 gflops vs 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1688 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 43.2 billion / sec vs 38.02 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1688 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 43.2 billion / sec vs 38.02 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4890 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4890 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 769 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 v2 | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM206 | G92 |
Launch date | 17 November 2015 | 28 March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 436 | 438 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1038 MHz | 1688 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,217 gflops | 432.1 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 38.02 GTexel / s | 43.2 billion / sec |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 70.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |