NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 2.1x more boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 60.2x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
• 112x more pipelines: 1344 vs 12
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
• 37.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3450 vs 92
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 276 vs 236

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon X1600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3450 92
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	276 236

Compare specifications (specs)