NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M vs AMD Radeon HD 8870M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M and AMD Radeon HD 8870M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 941 MHz vs 725 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 967 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 108.3 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s
- 2.1x more pipelines: 1344 vs 640
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 2,599 gflops vs 992.0 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3473 vs 1638
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12737 vs 8804
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.836 vs 24.097
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 960.114 vs 465.496
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.038 vs 2.211
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.57 vs 38.126
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz vs 725 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s vs 31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops vs 992.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3473 vs 1638 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 vs 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 vs 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 vs 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 vs 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 vs 38.126 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3702 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8870M
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 629 vs 277
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 106.848 vs 81.753
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 629 vs 277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.848 vs 81.753 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8870M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3473 | 1638 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 277 | 629 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12737 | 8804 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.836 | 24.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 960.114 | 465.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.038 | 2.211 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 59.57 | 38.126 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 81.753 | 106.848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M | AMD Radeon HD 8870M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Venus |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 735 | 736 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 967 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 725 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 992.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.3 GTexel / s | 31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Compute units | 10 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 7700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8870M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIATesla K80m
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 870M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940A
