NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 M350
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and AMD Radeon R7 M350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 950 MHz vs 825 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- 2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,946 gflops vs 779.5 gflops
- 5x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz vs 825 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 24.36 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops vs 779.5 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M350
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 924 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 924 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M350
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M350 |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1167 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 235 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6788 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 722 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3227 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1830 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1830 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD Radeon R7 M350 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GM206 | Meso |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 1154 | 1155 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | 825 MHz |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | 779.5 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 24.36 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 3,100 million |
Compute units | 6 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 16 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |