NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 60x more texture fill rate: 144 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 51.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 40
- 90.8x better floating-point performance: 4,358 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 128 MB
Launch date | 21 September 2015 vs 28 June 2007 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 4,358 gflops vs 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 128 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- 8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100-200 Watt
- 200x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100-200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4053 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 52 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop) | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GM204 | RV610 |
Launch date | 21 September 2015 | 28 June 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $395.82 | |
Place in performance rating | 566 | 569 |
Price now | $605.06 | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1216 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 2048 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,358 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 144 billion / sec | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100-200 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 180 million |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | 1 | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
VGA аnalog display support | 1 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-II |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 1 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 224 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7.0 GB/s | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |