NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp and AMD Radeon R9 290X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
- Around 67% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 947 MHz
- 3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 255.521 vs 114.883
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2621.94 vs 2460.464
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.26 vs 11.12
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1376.357 vs 628.757
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10550 vs 8729
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10550 vs 8729
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 947 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 vs 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 vs 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 vs 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 vs 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 vs 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 vs 8729 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 vs 34.491
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 vs 3698
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 vs 3698
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 vs 34.491 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3343 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 255.521 | 114.883 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2621.94 | 2460.464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.26 | 11.12 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 34.491 | 120.942 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1376.357 | 628.757 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10550 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10550 | 8729 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 7055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3353 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8644 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 770 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42508 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3949 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Xp | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 318 | 287 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | |
Code name | Hawaii | |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch date | 24 October 2013 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $549 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 947 MHz |
CUDA cores | 3840 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 5,632 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Pipelines | 2816 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture fill rate | 176.0 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DisplayPort, HDMI | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.4 in | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 10.5 in | 275 mm |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin + 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 547.7 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 512 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |