NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs Intel HD Graphics 620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and Intel HD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 5.1x more core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 51% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1050 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1830 vs 922
• Around 61% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6740 vs 4178
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 vs 227.879
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 vs 1.508
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 15.582
• 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 vs 30.288
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2680 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 1733
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2680 vs 1404
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 1733

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 620

• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 216 vs 214
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.275 vs 21.591

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1830 922
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	214 216
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6740 4178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 24.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 227.879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 1.508
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 15.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 30.288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 1404
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 1733
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3340

Compare specifications (specs)