NVIDIA GeForce MX230 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX230 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX230

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1519 MHz vs 1228 MHz
• Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 30 Watt
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1840 vs 1639
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6691 vs 3053
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 21.591 vs 20.138
• Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 445.82 vs 318.72
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.736 vs 1.391
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 32.43 vs 24.886
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 102.234 vs 84.858
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3705 vs 2875
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3328
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3705 vs 2875
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 443 vs 217
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2680
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2680

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX230
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1840 1639
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	217 443
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6691 3053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	21.591 20.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	445.82 318.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.736 1.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	32.43 24.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	102.234 84.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3705 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3328

Compare specifications (specs)