NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs AMD FireStream 9270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 2464x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2048 vs 800
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 55 nm
- 6.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5764 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2022 vs 13 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 800 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5764 vs 1341 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270
- 2.4x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | AMD FireStream 9270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5764 | 1341 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | AMD FireStream 9270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | TeraScale |
Code name | GA107 | RV770 |
Launch date | May 2022 | 13 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 301 | 284 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 750 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | unknown | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |