NVIDIA GeForce MX570 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3952.9x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec
- 5.8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 352
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5764 vs 1617
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2022 vs 25 May 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 18.7 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 352 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5764 vs 1617 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 404
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 458 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5764 | 1617 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
Code name | GA107 | GF100 |
Launch date | May 2022 | 25 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 301 | 291 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 850 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 352 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 18.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | unknown | 3,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 598.4 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 76.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |