NVIDIA GeForce MX570A vs Intel HD Graphics 400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX570A and Intel HD Graphics 400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 832 MHz vs 320 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 1155 MHz vs 640 MHz
- 8800x more texture fill rate: 73.92 GTexel/s vs 8.4 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 2048 vs 96
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 37.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39907 vs 1069
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | May 2022 vs 1 April 2015 |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz vs 320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz vs 640 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s vs 8.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 96 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39907 vs 1069 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 400
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX570A
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 400
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6154 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39907 | 1069 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce MX570A | Intel HD Graphics 400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Generation 8.0 |
Code name | GA107 | Braswell GT1 |
Launch date | May 2022 | 1 April 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 318 | 1706 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1155 MHz | 640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 832 MHz | 320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 73.92 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.731 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2048 | 96 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 73.92 GTexel/s | 8.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 6 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 134.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | DDR3L |