NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 215 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 6966
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 6293
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 6966
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 6293
- 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 1763
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 215 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 vs 1763 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 58% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
- 10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18757 vs 13619
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 907 vs 612
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105037 vs 76826
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 20002
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 20002
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18757 vs 13619 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 907 vs 612 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105037 vs 76826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 20002 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 20002 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13619 | 18757 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | 907 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 | 105037 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 | 1763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104B | TU104 |
Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 107 | 104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |