NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q and NVIDIA TITAN RTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 W vs 280 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 10384 vs 3707
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10130 vs 3353
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 10384 vs 3707
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10130 vs 3353
- Around 95% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7412 vs 3804
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 vs 18 December 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W vs 280 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 vs 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 vs 3804 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN RTX
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 64% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 2560
- 10.2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective)
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20221 vs 13619
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 831 vs 612
- Around 80% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138072 vs 76826
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25820 vs 20002
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25820 vs 20002
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4608 vs 2560 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20221 vs 13619 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 831 vs 612 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138072 vs 76826 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25820 vs 20002 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25820 vs 20002 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN RTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13619 | 20221 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 612 | 831 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76826 | 138072 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20002 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 10384 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10130 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20002 | 25820 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 10384 | 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10130 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7412 | 3804 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q | NVIDIA TITAN RTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | TU102 |
| Launch date | 2 Apr 2020 | 18 December 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 107 | 106 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.06 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.530 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 4608 |
| Pixel fill rate | 69.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 172.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 W | 280 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| DisplayPort count | 3 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 352.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1375 MHz (11000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A4500 Embedded
