NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1246 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21790 vs 12633
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 515
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3198
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 11451
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3555
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3198
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 vs 21 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1246 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1752 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21790 vs 12633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 515 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3198 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 166109 vs 138643
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 166109 vs 138643 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21790 | 12633 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 | 515 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138643 | 166109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3198 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 | 11451 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3198 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14629 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | TU102 | GV100 |
Launch date | 20 September 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Place in performance rating | 87 | 209 |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1246 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,131 gflops | |
Pipelines | 5120 | |
Texture fill rate | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 897.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
Memory type | HBM2 |