NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6600M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB and AMD Radeon RX 6600M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

• Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 712

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1237 MHz
• Around 41% higher boost clock speed: 2105 MHz vs 1492 MHz
• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 235.8 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13789 vs 10638
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 65659 vs 56675
• Around 65% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8001 vs 4842

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600M

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	807 712
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	10638 13789
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	56675 65659
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	4842 8001

Compare specifications (specs)