NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla T4 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16407 vs 10616
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 641 vs 592
- Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 103038 vs 61276
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26045 vs 14076
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 1976
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1781
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26045 vs 14076
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 1976
- Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1781
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 September 2018 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16407 vs 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 vs 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 103038 vs 61276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 vs 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1781 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- 6.7x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16407 | 10616 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 641 | 592 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 103038 | 61276 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26045 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26045 | 14076 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2644 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 137 | 270 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 239.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 15.30 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 119.5 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 239.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
DisplayPort support | ||
G-SYNC support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 10000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |