NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 780 MHz
• Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1245 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
• 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 239.0 GTexel/s vs 162.0 GTexel/s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 2560
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 597
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16477 vs 14014
• Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98850 vs 71666

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	597 642
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14014 16477
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71666 98850

Compare specifications (specs)