NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200 vs Matrox G450 x4 MMS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200 and Matrox G450 x4 MMS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 143 MHz vs 125 MHz
| Launch date | 6 February 2001 vs 1 January 2001 |
| Core clock speed | 143 MHz vs 125 MHz |
Reasons to consider the Matrox G450 x4 MMS
- 7.4x more texture fill rate: 4x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec vs 572 MTexel / s
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4x 32 MB vs 32 MB
| Texture fill rate | 4x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec vs 572 MTexel / s |
| Maximum memory size | 4x 32 MB vs 32 MB |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce2 Go 200 | Matrox G450 x4 MMS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Celsius | G400 |
| Code name | NV11 B2 | Condor |
| Launch date | 6 February 2001 | 1 January 2001 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 143 MHz | 125 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 180 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 572 MTexel / s | 4x 250.0 MTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 2 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 20 million | 10 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCI |
| Length | 168 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | None |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 MB | 4x 32 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.656 GB / s | 4x 2.656 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 4x 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 332 MHz | 332 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |