NVIDIA L4 vs AMD Radeon 780M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA L4 and AMD Radeon 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA L4
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 489.6 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s
- 10x more pipelines: 7680 vs 768
- 5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 140723 vs 27843
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 489.6 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 140723 vs 27843 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Around 89% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 795 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 2040 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 72 Watt
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 196
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7009 vs 6006
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 795 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 2040 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 5 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 72 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 196 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7009 vs 6006 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA L4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 780M
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA L4 | AMD Radeon 780M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 140723 | 27843 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6006 | 7009 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 478 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA L4 | AMD Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
Code name | AD104 | Phoenix |
Place in performance rating | 228 | 226 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2040 MHz | 2900 MHz |
Core clock speed | 795 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 7680 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 163.2 GPixel/s | 92.80 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 489.6 GTexel/s | 139.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 72 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 169 mm, 6.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 56 mm, 2.2 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | System Shared |
Memory bandwidth | 300.1 GB/s | System Dependent |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 1563 MHz, 12.5 Gbps effective | System Shared |
Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |