NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 832 MHz
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1755 MHz vs 1155 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 832 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz vs 1155 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 73.92 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2048 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 115 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 630 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 17 Dec 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 167 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 1155 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 832 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 147.8 GFLOPS (1:32) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | 9.462 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 56.16 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 30 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |