AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 760M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 760M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 60% higher boost clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1755 MHz
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 904 vs 630
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1755 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 vs 630 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 140.4 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 2560 vs 384
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14441 vs 5648
- 3.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74538 vs 20395
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2023 vs 4 Jan 2023 |
Texture fill rate | 140.4 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14441 vs 5648 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74538 vs 20395 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 760M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 904 | 630 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5648 | 14441 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20395 | 74538 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1788 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 760M | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | Phoenix | AD107 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 165 | 167 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1755 MHz |
Compute units | 6 | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 44.80 GPixel/s | 56.16 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 140.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 25390 million | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 140.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.986 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |