NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1485 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
Launch date | 2023 vs 30 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1485 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 3.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7881 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39165 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 134.765 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1316.075 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.915 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 573.418 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10959 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
Code name | AD106 | TU107 |
Launch date | 2023 | 30 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 376 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1485 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |