NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 211.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Launch date | 2023 vs 11 May 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD106 | GA107 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 11 May 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz | 1035 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2505 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS (1:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 13.52 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 84.48 GPixel/s | 33.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 211.2 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 75 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Ti GA107
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Max-Q
