NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1470 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1650 MHz
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2176
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 52% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 175 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 16476
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 87635
- 1127.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1470 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1650 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2176 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 vs 16476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 vs 87635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 vs 2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 vs 732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 vs 732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 856 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 16476 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 87635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2 July 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 123 | 148 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1650 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1470 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2176 |
| Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 175 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 2176 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 89 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Transistor count | 10.8 B | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8 pin |
| Height | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
| Length | 9.0” (228.60mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Width | 2-Slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Max 24-core
