NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17566 vs 17107
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89106 vs 88251
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2255 vs 1961
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2023 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 vs 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 vs 88251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 vs 1961 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 732
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 181.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 732 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 732 | 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 17566 | 17107 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 89106 | 88251 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2255 | 1961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 12 Jan 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 123 | 134 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1890 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1320 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 181.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 11.61 TFLOPS | 12.74 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 60.48 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 181.4 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
| Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
| Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

