NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 7680 vs 3840
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 1081
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 19722
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 2302
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 101650
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 311.253
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 33.932
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 169.697
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 1500.926
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 7680 vs 3840 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 vs 1081 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 vs 19722 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 vs 2302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 vs 101650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 vs 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 vs 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 vs 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 vs 1500.926 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2310 MHz
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2610 MHz
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 285 Watt
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Launch date | 2023 vs 3 Jan 2023 |
Core clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 2310 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2640 MHz vs 2610 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 285 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1198 | 1081 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31655 | 19722 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5024 | 2302 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 205069 | 101650 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 939.363 | 311.253 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 67.426 | 33.932 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 348.259 | 169.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2895.895 | 1500.926 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD104 | AD106 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 2023 |
Place in performance rating | 8 | 75 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2610 MHz | 2640 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 2505 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.09 TFLOPS | 20.28 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 7680 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 208.8 GPixel/s | 126.7 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 626.4 GTexel/s | 316.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 285 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 35800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 42 mm, 1.7 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | 550 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 504.2 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |