NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

  • Around 98% higher texture fill rate: 626.4 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
  • 2x more pipelines: 7680 vs 3840
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1198 vs 1081
  • Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31655 vs 19722
  • 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5024 vs 2302
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 205069 vs 101650
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 939.363 vs 311.253
  • Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 67.426 vs 33.932
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 348.259 vs 169.697
  • Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2895.895 vs 1500.926
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 626.4 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
Pipelines 7680 vs 3840
Maximum memory size 12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 1198 vs 1081
PassMark - G3D Mark 31655 vs 19722
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5024 vs 2302
Geekbench - OpenCL 205069 vs 101650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 939.363 vs 311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 67.426 vs 33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 348.259 vs 169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2895.895 vs 1500.926

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 8% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2310 MHz
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2610 MHz
  • Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 285 Watt
  • Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective
Launch date 2023 vs 3 Jan 2023
Core clock speed 2505 MHz vs 2310 MHz
Boost clock speed 2640 MHz vs 2610 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt vs 285 Watt
Memory clock speed 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1198
1081
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
31655
19722
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
5024
2302
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
205069
101650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
939.363
311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
67.426
33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
348.259
169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2895.895
1500.926
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark 1198 1081
PassMark - G3D Mark 31655 19722
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 5024 2302
Geekbench - OpenCL 205069 101650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 939.363 311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 67.426 33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 348.259 169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2895.895 1500.926
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6622.553

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Ada Lovelace
Code name AD104 AD106
Launch date 3 Jan 2023 2023
Place in performance rating 8 75

Technical info

Boost clock speed 2610 MHz 2640 MHz
Core clock speed 2310 MHz 2505 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 4 nm 4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 626.4 GFLOPS (1:64) 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 40.09 TFLOPS (1:1) 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 40.09 TFLOPS 20.28 TFLOPS
Pipelines 7680 3840
Pixel fill rate 208.8 GPixel/s 126.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 626.4 GTexel/s 316.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 285 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 35800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor Dual-slot Dual-slot
Height 42 mm, 1.7 inches
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 285 mm, 11.2 inches
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt 550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1x 16-pin 1x 12-pin
Width 112 mm, 4.4 inches

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 3.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.7 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 504.2 GB/s 288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 bit 128 bit
Memory clock speed 1313 MHz, 21 Gbps effective 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Memory type GDDR6X GDDR6