NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 442.3 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s
- Around 31% higher pipelines: 9728 vs 7424
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
| Texture fill rate | 442.3 GTexel/s vs 386.3 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 9728 vs 7424 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 25104 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 18885 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 160835 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Code name | AD103 | AD104 |
| Launch date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 32 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1290 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 442.3 GFLOPS (1:64) | 386.3 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 28.31 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 28.31 TFLOPS | 24.72 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 9728 | 7424 |
| Pixel fill rate | 163.0 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 442.3 GTexel/s | 386.3 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 45900 million | 35800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090
