NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 510 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- 3.1x more pipelines: 18176 vs 5888
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 8 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 48 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Launch date | 3 Dec 2022 vs 4 Jan 2022 |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 510 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Pipelines | 18176 vs 5888 |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 8 nm |
Maximum memory size | 48 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
- 133.8x more texture fill rate: 190.4 GTexel/s vs 1,423 GTexel/s
- 3.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 300 Watt
Texture fill rate | 190.4 GTexel/s vs 1,423 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
Name | NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 976 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28791 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 317204 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD102 | GA104 |
Launch date | 3 Dec 2022 | 4 Jan 2022 |
Place in performance rating | 4 | not rated |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 510 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 18176 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 481.0 GPixel/s | 99.36 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 1,423 GTexel/s | 190.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 76300 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 190.4 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.19 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.19 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 48 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |