NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T1000 8 GB and NVIDIA RTX A2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
- Around 90% higher core clock speed: 1065 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 70 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 70 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 124.8 GTexel/s vs 78.12 GTexel/s
- 3.7x more pipelines: 3328 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 876
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13585 vs 7654
- Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 73337 vs 38055
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 6 May 2021 |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s vs 78.12 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 876 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 vs 7654 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 vs 38055 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T1000 8 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A2000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T1000 8 GB | NVIDIA RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 | 971 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7654 | 13585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38055 | 73337 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T1000 8 GB | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Code name | TU117 | GA106 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 10 Aug 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 140 | 128 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1065 MHz | 562 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 78.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.500 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 896 | 3328 |
| Pixel fill rate | 44.64 GPixel/s | 57.60 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 78.12 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 70 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 13250 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | |
| Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
