NVIDIA P104-100 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P104-100 and AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P104-100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 79% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 512
- 9.3x better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 952.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.2x more memory clock speed: 10008 MHz vs 4600 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 44280 vs 40722
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3636 vs 1457
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 vs 21 December 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 29.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 952.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz vs 4600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44280 vs 40722 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3636 vs 1457 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 124
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 124 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P104-100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 44280 | 40722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 124 | 394 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3636 | 1457 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3112 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P104-100 | AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Cape Verde |
Launch date | 12 December 2017 | 21 December 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 609 | 601 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 930 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | 900 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | 952.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 512 |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s | 29.76 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 1,500 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 320.3 GB / s | 73.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |