NVIDIA P106-090 vs AMD Radeon RX 550

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-090 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1183 MHz
• Around 94% higher texture fill rate: 73.49 GTexel / s vs 37.86 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• 1960x better floating-point performance: 2,352 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7000 MHz
• Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 11659
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 33.507
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 1037.305
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 183.725 vs 140.911
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 3.064
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 52.533

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 4.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 478 vs 104
• Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2717 vs 2448

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-090
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19027 11659
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	104 478
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2448 2717
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.225 33.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1309.517 1037.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	183.725 140.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.178 3.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.651 52.533

Compare specifications (specs)