NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA P106-090
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA P106-090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 465.4x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 73.49 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 183.725
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 31 July 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s vs 73.49 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 vs 183.725 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 420 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19027 vs 16982
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 58.805
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 785.059
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 3.961
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 53.111
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 420 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19027 vs 16982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 vs 58.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 vs 785.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 vs 3.961 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 53.111 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-090
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA P106-090 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16982 | 19027 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 86.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 1309.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 6.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 58.651 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 183.725 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 104 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2448 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA P106-090 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 31 July 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 887 | 888 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | 73.49 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 4,400 million |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 250 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T400 with others
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
NVIDIAT400 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8310E
NVIDIAT400 vs
NVIDIAP106-090
NVIDIAT400 vs
AppleM2 8-core
