NVIDIA P106-090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-090 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 31.471
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 vs 31.471 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1354 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 394.8 GTexel / s vs 73.49 GTexel / s
- 5x more pipelines: 3840 vs 768
- 5.4x better floating-point performance: 12,634 gflops vs 2,352 gflops
- 8x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63932 vs 21304
- 7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 104
- 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15451 vs 2448
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 194.277 vs 86.225
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1916.09 vs 1309.517
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 545.751 vs 183.725
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 17.951 vs 6.178
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1354 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 394.8 GTexel / s vs 73.49 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops vs 2,352 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 8008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 63932 vs 21304 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 725 vs 104 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15451 vs 2448 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 vs 86.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 vs 1309.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 vs 183.725 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 vs 6.178 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21304 | 63932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 104 | 725 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2448 | 15451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.225 | 194.277 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1309.517 | 1916.09 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 183.725 | 545.751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.178 | 17.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 58.651 | 31.471 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA P106-090 | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP106 | GP102 |
Launch date | 31 July 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 852 | 204 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Price now | $4,403.52 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1531 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | 12,634 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 3840 |
Texture fill rate | 73.49 GTexel / s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |