NVIDIA Quadro 500M vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro 500M and NVIDIA Quadro 5010M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M
- Around 56% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 365 vs 297
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 vs 297 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
- Around 93% higher texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 571
- Around 86% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16261 vs 8743
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 268.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 571 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16261 vs 8743 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro 500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro 500M | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 571 | 1691 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 365 | 297 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8743 | 16261 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro 500M | NVIDIA Quadro 5010M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GF110 |
Launch date | 22 February 2011 | 22 February 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 604 | 605 |
Price now | $275.14 | $235.95 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.18 | 10.17 |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 11.2 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 83.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 2600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 ECC |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) |