AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM and NVIDIA Quadro 500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
  • 2.7x more texture fill rate: 29.76 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 96
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 952.3 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.6x more memory clock speed: 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 365
  • 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1457 vs 571
  • 4.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 40722 vs 8743
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 December 2013 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed 900 MHz vs 700 MHz
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s vs 11.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 512 vs 96
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops vs 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 vs 365
PassMark - G3D Mark 1457 vs 571
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 vs 8743

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 500M

  • Around 86% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 65 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 65 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 500M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
394
365
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1457
571
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
40722
8743
Name AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 500M
PassMark - G2D Mark 394 365
PassMark - G3D Mark 1457 571
Geekbench - OpenCL 40722 8743
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3112
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM NVIDIA Quadro 500M

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Fermi
Code name Cape Verde GF108
Launch date 21 December 2013 22 February 2011
Place in performance rating 599 602
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $275.14
Value for money (0-100) 3.18

Technical info

Boost clock speed 930 MHz
Core clock speed 900 MHz 700 MHz
Floating-point performance 952.3 gflops 268.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 512 96
Texture fill rate 29.76 GTexel / s 11.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 1,500 million 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 73.6 GB / s 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3