NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 606 MHz vs 530 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 106 vs 50
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 vs 1 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 606 MHz vs 530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 60 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 vs 50 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
- 3.3x more texture fill rate: 16 billion / sec vs 4.85 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 64 vs 16
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 169.6 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
- Around 1% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 534 vs 121
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 16 billion / sec vs 4.85 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 169.6 gflops vs 46.98 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 1580 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 534 vs 121 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 121 | 534 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 106 | 50 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2851 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2414 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT218 | G94 |
Launch date | 7 January 2010 | 1 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1478 | 1479 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 606 MHz | 530 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 46.98 gflops | 169.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 16 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 4.85 GTexel / s | 16 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 260 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Gigaflops | 254 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 12.64 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1580 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Power management | 8.0 |