NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 9.2x more texture fill rate: 12 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 768 MB vs 128 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 12.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 426 vs 33
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 March 2007 vs 12 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Maximum memory size | 768 MB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 vs 33 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 129 vs 124
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 129 vs 124 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 426 | 33 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 124 | 129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3230 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3230 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 ZT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Rankine |
Code name | G80 | NV35 |
Launch date | 5 March 2007 | 12 May 2003 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Place in performance rating | 1217 | 1220 |
Price now | $143.51 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.45 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 230.4 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | |
Transistor count | 681 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | 22.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 700 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |