NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 652.8 gflops vs 230.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 134 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 768 MB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1202 vs 426
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 236 vs 124
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 vs 5 March 2007 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops vs 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 768 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 vs 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 vs 124 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3230 vs 1913
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3230 vs 1913
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3230 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3230 vs 1913 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1202 | 426 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 236 | 124 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3788 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.947 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.824 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.982 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.773 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 23.111 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2283 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1913 | 3230 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2283 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3299 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1913 | 3230 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 414 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK107 | G80 |
Launch date | 22 March 2012 | 5 March 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1215 | 1218 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | |
Price now | $143.51 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 5.45 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Floating-point performance | 652.8 gflops | 230.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 134 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 681 million |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Texture fill rate | 12 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectCompute | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Optimus |