NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000 and NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 295 MHz vs 250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 72% higher memory clock speed: 570 MHz vs 332 MHz
| Core clock speed | 295 MHz vs 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 570 MHz vs 332 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300
- 423.7x more texture fill rate: 500 MTexel / s vs 1.18 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 500 MTexel / s vs 1.18 GTexel / s |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1000 | NVIDIA GeForce PCX 4300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Rankine | Celsius |
| Code name | NV36 A1 | NV19 |
| Launch date | 25 February 2004 | 19 February 2004 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 295 MHz | 250 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 150 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.18 GTexel / s | 500 MTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 82 million | 29 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 9.0a | 8.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 1.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 9.12 GB / s | 2.656 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 570 MHz | 332 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |