NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 775 MHz
  • 2.9x more texture fill rate: 17.98 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 384 vs 160
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 332
  • 7.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6069 vs 770
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 April 2016 vs 5 May 2015
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 775 MHz
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s vs 6.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 160
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops vs 248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt vs 35 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1163 vs 332
Geekbench - OpenCL 6069 vs 770

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

  • 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 180
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 545 vs 180

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1163
332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
180
545
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6069
770
Name NVIDIA Quadro M500M AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 1163 332
PassMark - G2D Mark 180 545
Geekbench - OpenCL 6069 770
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2174
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1729
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3122
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3122
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.002
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 110.092
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.228
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 5.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 23.621

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M500M AMD Radeon R5 310 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell TeraScale 2
Code name GM108 Caicos
Launch date 27 April 2016 5 May 2015
Place in performance rating 1092 1095
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1124 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops 248.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 160
Texture fill rate 17.98 GTexel / s 6.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 370 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Length 168 mm

API support

DirectX 12 11.2 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.4
Shader Model 5.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

nView Display Management
Optimus