NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M and ATI Radeon X800 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 80 nm vs 130 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 48 Watt
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 97 vs 65
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 vs 1 May 2004 |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 97 vs 65 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 5.7 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 5.7 GTexel / s vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M | ATI Radeon X800 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 97 | 65 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 190 | 190 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M | ATI Radeon X800 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R400 |
Code name | G86 | R423 |
Launch date | 9 May 2007 | 1 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 910 | 913 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 475 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 12.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 8 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.6 GTexel / s | 5.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 210 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR2 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
nView |