NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 23.6x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 236 Watt
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1107 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 168 vs 57
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2008 vs 16 June 2008 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 236 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1107 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 vs 57 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 530 MHz
- 22.7x more texture fill rate: 48.2 billion / sec vs 2.12 GTexel / s
- 30x more pipelines: 240 vs 8
- 29.9x better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 20.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 18.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1278 vs 70
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 530 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion / sec vs 2.12 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 240 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops vs 20.8 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1278 vs 70 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 70 | 1278 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 168 | 57 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 21396 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | G98 | GT200 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2008 | 16 June 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 1037 | 1038 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $522.78 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 2.98 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 1296 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | 622.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 8 | 240 |
| Texture fill rate | 2.12 GTexel / s | 48.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 236 Watt |
| Transistor count | 210 million | 1,400 million |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI |
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-I | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 141.7 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1107 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||

