NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1278 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 5x more texture fill rate: 193.7 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s
- 10.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 192
- 13.4x better floating-point performance: 6,197 gflops vs 462.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 8% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 108 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 30 March 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 193.7 GTexel / s vs 38.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops vs 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 108 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 825 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13337 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3258 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3258 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GT200B |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 30 March 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,885 | $799 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1363 |
Price now | $1,699.99 | $109.99 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.05 | 9.89 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1278 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 6,197 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 193.7 GTexel / s | 38.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 108 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 1,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |