NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 14.8x more texture fill rate: 34.92 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
- 48x more pipelines: 384 vs 8
- 49.8x better floating-point performance: 1,117 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 26.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3327 vs 126
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 309
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 26 November 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 589 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops vs 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 vs 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3327 | 126 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 | 309 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | GT218 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 26 November 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Place in performance rating | 556 | 555 |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 589 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 22.432 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 8 |
Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 2.356 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 31 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 168 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |