NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 980 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 668.7x more memory clock speed: 4012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 548 vs 533
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 141.164 vs 86.208
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3686
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3686
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 10 May 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 vs 533 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 vs 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3686 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 3.5x more pipelines: 1344 vs 384
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5332 vs 3318
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15502 vs 11181
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.613 vs 35.134
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7038 vs 4662
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7038 vs 4662
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 102.5 billion / sec vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops vs 1,117 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5332 vs 3318 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15502 vs 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.613 vs 35.134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7038 vs 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7038 vs 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3318 | 5332 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 533 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 | 15502 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | 41.613 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 | 86.208 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 | 7038 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3686 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 971.208 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.404 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P600 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 10 May 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | $399 |
| Place in performance rating | 561 | 564 |
| Price now | $169.99 | $474.99 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | 13.20 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1329 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 34.92 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | Two 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P600 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 540
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 670
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8970M
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAQuadro P600 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
