NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 9.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12389 vs 7225
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 13720
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 13720
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 20 June 2016 |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1430 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12389 vs 7225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 13720 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1190 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 548
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6381 vs 3716
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6381 vs 3716
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8915 vs 3359
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8915 vs 3359
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78296 vs 70127
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1190 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 548 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6381 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6381 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8915 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8915 vs 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78296 vs 70127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 572 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12389 | 7225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 13720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 6381 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8915 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70127 | 78296 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | GP100 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 20 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 191 | 193 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,699 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1190 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1430 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600M
