NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 7987
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 9143
  • Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 9143
  • Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68858 vs 43046
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 26 March 2014
Core clock speed 780 - 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 12794 vs 7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18169 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18169 vs 9143
Geekbench - OpenCL 68858 vs 43046

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

  • Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 566
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3716
  • 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3716
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3359
  • 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3359
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2816 vs 2560
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 752 vs 566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8219 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8219 vs 3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 32085 vs 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 32085 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
566
752
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12794
7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
32085
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68858
43046
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 752
PassMark - G3D Mark 12794 7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18169 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18169 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 32085
Geekbench - OpenCL 68858 43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 511.115

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q AMD FirePro W9100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 2.0
Code name N19E-Q3 MAX-Q Hawaii
Launch date 27 May 2019 26 March 2014
Place in performance rating 181 190
Type Mobile workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 - 1485 MHz
Core clock speed 780 - 960 MHz 930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2560 2816
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 750 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 6,200 million
Floating-point performance 5,238 gflops
Texture fill rate 163.7 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Form factor Full Height / Full Length
Length 275 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 320 GB / s

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready