NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 750 Watt
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12513 vs 7705
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 9143
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 9143
- Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70509 vs 43046
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 26 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 750 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12513 vs 7705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 9143 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70509 vs 43046 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 811 vs 529
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3716
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3716
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3359
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 811 vs 529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 529 | 811 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12513 | 7705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 9143 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 32085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 32085 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70509 | 43046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 106.585 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1878.403 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.751 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.208 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | Hawaii |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 26 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 199 | 198 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 930 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2816 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 750 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 163.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
G-SYNC support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |