NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 610 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 12650
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 595
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 9 April 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 vs 12650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 vs 595 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 188 Watt vs 250 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 | 12650 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 791 | 595 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | TU102 | GT200B |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 9 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Place in performance rating | 112 | 84 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 188 Watt |
Transistor count | 18,600 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Pipelines | 240 | |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |