NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26506 vs 19571
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26506 vs 19571
- Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 114349 vs 74179
Specifications (specs) | |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 vs 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 vs 19571 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 114349 vs 74179 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 792 vs 616
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18675 vs 16138
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1575 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3356 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 792 vs 616 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18675 vs 16138 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26506 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26506 | 19571 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 616 | 792 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16138 | 18675 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 114349 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Code name | GA104 | TU102 |
Place in performance rating | 118 | 120 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 604.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.35 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 151.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |