NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1329 MHz
- 2000x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 99% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 3327
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 11181
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 35.134
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 4662
- Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 4662
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1329 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 3327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 35.134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 542 vs 404
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 542 vs 404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 3327 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 542 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 11181 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 35.134 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 4662 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 400 | 556 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
| Price now | $169.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1557 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1329 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 64.19 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 150M
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M365X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500M
